Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] > Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:21 PM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside > > > At 05:09 PM 6/4/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote: > >For this case, I'm not sure I see as much reason to argue with this. > >W3C XML Schema is already used by the W3C for its XML > protocol work and > >standardization not balkanization should be the order of the > day. Most > >of the arguments about the complexity of W3C XML Schema for > the average > >end user don't apply to Internet protocols. After all, how > many regular > >users look at SOAP messages or HTTP requests? > > I'm not sure how many people read those messages directly, but I'd > certainly be unhappy if <bar /> got past the validator when I > was expecting > <foo /> as in Clark's point 7. Both the XmlValidatingReader in the .NET framework and MSXML will throw errors because no type definition exists for the <bar /> element. This is one of the issues I'd have brought up if I was on the mailing list and replying to JC's email. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Never eat yellow snow. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
