• To: 'Jonathan Robie' <jonathan.robie@d...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:19:46 -0500

There is so much "us vs them" thinking in that paper as 
to make it a sure source of ignition and virtually useless 
for a rational person trying to decide when and if to patent 
a reasonably patentable artifact.   

Again, why is the WSIO the fastest growing consortium today?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@d...]

This page will probably interest many on XML-Dev:

http://xml.coverpages.org/patents.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
    • From: Robin Cover <robin@i...>
  • Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The vision for XPath 2.0
• Next by Date: RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Previous by thread: Re: The vision for XPath 2.0
• Next by thread: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread