• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:41:05 -0700
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C69AEF@r...>

At 01:39 PM 5/7/2002 -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>The bottom of that email clearly stated it was personal opinion. As a
>Microsoft representative, I can state unequivocably that my team is
>dedicated to pursuing full compliance with the W3C XML recommendations
>we support. On this list and others I read I have been proactive in
>ensuring that any issues users have with the compliance level of our
>technologies is addressed by my team.
>
>Heck, just this morning I flamed one of my coworkers for suggesting we
>work around bugs in XML Schema spec because it would lead to
>non-conformance with the the recommednation even though competing
>implementations do that already.

I think Microsoft has done a very good job of conforming to XML Schema. As 
a user, I really appreciate this. I spend a lot of time getting 
heterogeneous systems to talk to each other, and conformance to the 
standards is really important to make interoperability happen.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by thread: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread