• To: jonathan.robie@d...
• Subject: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:42:35 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020513061034.02c31ce0@n...>(message from Jonathan Robie on Mon, 13 May 2002 06:21:26 -0700)
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020513061034.02c31ce0@n...>

> pointing you to the 
> XPath 2.0 requirements document. This is largely a set of requests that 
> XSLT users have made for extensions to XPath, as I understand i

Are you sure?

> However, support for types 
> *is* one of the features that has been requested.

Did _anyone_ (outside the schema WG)  ever request support for schema
complex types in XSLT. (This is a serious question, I have never seen
the subject come up on any XSL forum that I follow).

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
  • Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Transforming XML to HTML browser side
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread