• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: PSVI formalization
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 14:15:55 -0700
• In-reply-to: <00c001c1f78c$f6015890$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• References: <000b01c1f786$4c628d50$887ba8c0@mitchum><1020969751.984.2388.camel@l...>

At 05:08 AM 5/10/2002 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>  <a  b="c">zzzz</a>
>
>becomes
>
>   <a psvi:type="something" psvi:validation-attempted="full" 
> psvi-valid="true" >
>     <psvi:attribute name="b" psvi:type="someothertype" >c</psvi:attribute
>    >zzzz</a>

The current PSVI contains all the right data, but it is much too detailed, 
and it doesn't seem to be based on the abstractions people will want to use 
for everyday processing. I think we need a better representation of this 
information. The Formal Description is closer. Doing this right will take 
some time and thought.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: PSVI formalization
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: PSVI formalization
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: RE: PSVI formalization
• Previous by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread