• To: jborden@a...
• Subject: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 08 May 2002 14:55:53 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20020508183718.FLHF22408.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@rwcrwbc55>
• References: <20020508183718.FLHF22408.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@rwcrwbc55>

On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 14:37, jborden@a... wrote:
> Well, if XPointer ever makes it OTD, and gets used, then
> presumably we might just see XPath getting used more and
> more across the web.
> 
> Seeing as how XQuery and XPath 2.0 are fairly similar
> modulo syntax, you might just be effectively if not actually
> using XQuery across the net.

XPointer meets XQuery?  Gosh, URLs are getting amazingly complicated. 
Somehow type systems and character ranges seem like an odd combination.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
    • From: jborden@a...

• Prev by Date: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by Date: Re: Is XML-REST more scalable than SOAP?
• Previous by thread: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by thread: RE: Is XML-REST more scalable than SOAP?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread