• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 18:49:08 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: vdv@d..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1a5.1af7867.2a030728@a...> from "AndrewWatt2000@a..." at May 02, 2002 05:18:32 PM

AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit:

> The XML world is changing. The time of the "XML generalist" has begun to 
> pass. It probably hasn't quite disappeared yet. Hopefully this list won't 
> split. The diversity of inputs is fascinating, if sometimes a little 
> provocative.

This list will really be successful when "XML expert" sounds as bizarre
as "ASCII expert".

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: SOAP and the Web
• Next by Date: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Previous by thread: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Next by thread: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread