Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Actually, I was asking what the reasons are, i.e. those impedence mismatches. Rex At 2:46 PM -0700 5/1/02, Paul Prescod wrote: >Rex Brooks wrote: >> >>. ..The fact that it anticipates asynchronous >> functionality is IMHO the single most necessary feature for what is >> called web services. > >SOAP "anticipates" asynchronous functionality in roughly the same sense >that Unicode does. i.e. it says: "that's not our problem." > >I can do that with HTTP also. > >> ... Since REST is an architecture and SOAP is >> package wrapper method, are there reasons why SOAP could not fit >> inside REST? > >That's what the TAG is trying to do. But it's a little bit like saying: >"object oriented programming is a paradigm and awk is a programming >language. Can't we just use the programming language according to the >paradigm?" You have to address the impedence mismatches. > > Paul Prescod > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an >initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > >The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription >manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> --
|
