• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 02:18:49 -0700
• References: <200205151359.OAA04660@m...>

Richard Tobin wrote:

> If you added items corresponding to all the schema components - so
> that you could examine content models, type inheritance, datatype
> facets and so on - you would need at least two dozen.

Very much agreed, and that seems to be the crux of the anti-PSVI
argument.

(The other objection is that, regardless of the schema language, you end
up couching types in terms of XML Schemas types, since that is the data
model used.)

-- Ron

• References:
  • Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by Date: RE: Open Standards Organization
• Previous by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread