[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 6:45 AM -0700 5/13/02, Jonathan Robie wrote: >At 02:00 PM 5/12/2002 -0400, Mike Champion wrote: >>Nevertheless, if WG's don't define what the minimum interoperability >>profile for a spec is, someone else will step in to do it for >>them. > >For XQuery, some people have suggested the following conformance levels: > >1. Some implementations use only built-in types, and can not import a schema. >2. Some implementations may not be able to do static type checking. > What do you mean by "built-in types"? What typing information would be used for parsed input documents? -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | | http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|

Cart



