• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: [Off-Topic] Invisible Foot (Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 04:24:57 +1000
• References: <1V2XORZX2YE9B8YWQM82SPPPMB63.3cde8437@MChamp> <1861755499334.20020512172932@j...>

From: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@j...>

> What can we do to help Mother Nature, Father Darwin and the Invisible
> Hand (strange mental picture, that) on their course?

For any XML-DEVers interested in economic theory, there is quite a nice 
discussion of E.K. Hunt's argument that Smith's Inviible Hand is accompanied 
by an Invisible Foot,  at  http://www.zmag.org/books/3/3.htm

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by Date: RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread