• To: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• From: Claude Seyrat <claude.seyrat@e...>
• Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 17:09:54 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Expway
• References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205121006340.7974-100000@e...>
• Reply-to: claude.seyrat@e...

Rich Salz wrote:
> 
> > Finally, open source shall not be opposed to RAND. For instance,
> > in MPEG, reference softwares are open source. It is even mandatory
> > to provide an open source software otherwise the technology can't be
> > introduced within the standard.
> 
> That's a free reference implementation.  It is not 'open source' in the
> true sense of the definition.  See
> http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.html for the definition.
> In paticular, note the lack of licensing fees for use.

You are right I didn't have the same understanding. Anyway you have
the source code and the right to use it for your products. 

Regards,
Claude.
-- 

______________________________________________
** NEW ADDRESS **
- - - - - - - - - 

Claude Seyrat

EXPWAY
17, rue du Pont aux Choux
75003 Paris, France
T: +33 1 44 54 29 28
M: +33 6 07 66 26 63
F: +33 1 44 54 90 49
E: claude.seyrat@e...

www.expway.tv

• References:
  • Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Previous by thread: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Next by thread: Re: Patent non-proliferation and disarmament
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread