[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]



> XSLT doesn't have that luxury. When we add statements to XPath,
> instead of getting a nice unified language, we get a mess where we
> have two ways of doing the same things, one in XPath and one in XSLT.
> New users have to learn twice as much, or their tutors decide which

I've always wondered how the W3C looks issues of useability. I suspect
that if I had to teach XPath 2.0 to people, I would leave out most
things that were not in XPath 1.0 because I'd be scared to lose my
audience.

Getting XPath 1.0 expressions right is hard enough.. Personally, I
regard XPath expressions as atomic: they get me something out of a
document. There is no control flow in them, simple predicate tests
aside. With XPath 2.0, control flow will be scattered between the
languages built around XPath and the expressions themselves.

Christian



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member