• To: "'veillard@r...'" <veillard@r...>
• Subject: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:09:20 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

And of course, sellers of open source want everyone to believe 
they don't make unpublished extensions to open 
source software thus giving themselves closed source 
advantages.  Spy vs Spy.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@r...]

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:22:03PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> At the rate of attacks, at some point, Outlook 
> will be the most secure and virus resistant client 
> available. 

  ROTFL,

Sorry, security is design based, the process of tranforming a 
product not designed with security in mind by filling up the gaps
one by one as they get discovered on the customer deployments is
simply a pure (and sad) joke.

  Of course producers of closed source software would like people
to believe in this crap, but not here please !!!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: R ESTTutorial)
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by Date: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: R ESTTutorial)
• Previous by thread: RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by thread: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: R ESTTutorial)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread