• To: uche.ogbuji@f...
• Subject: Re: Crystallization?
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 17:32:24 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <200205071449.g47EnAB22029@l...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020501 Debian/1.0rc1-3

Hi Uche,

uche.ogbuji@f... wrote:

> My own definition of successful XML is as follows:
> 
> - Basically all that makes up Tim Bray's XML Skunkworks document
> - XPath 1.0
> - XSLT 1.0 + EXSLT

That's exactly what I think and I wonder if this is not the greater 
common set of features needed for pretty much everyone (ie document, 
web, semantic, data and web services heads).

This would explain why any feature added to this (such as a strong typed 
schema language) is so controversial...

Eric

-- 
See you in Barcelona.
                               http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/schedule.asp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • Crystallization?
    • From: uche.ogbuji@f...

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: Crystallization?
• Next by thread: Re: Crystallization?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread