• To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:51:42 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Ok.  John is the expert.   

Please elaborate on how RELAX is more powerful than XSD.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@r...]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> Don't overlook RELAX RNG.  Despite it's status 
> vis a vis the W3C, I think it has a future as 
> the "easier to do and easier to explain" schema 
> language with a little less than XSD and a 
> bit more than DTDs.

Make that "more power than DTDs or XSD, minus a few obfuscating
features of each."

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by Date: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Previous by thread: RE: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Next by thread: Re: DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread