Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Arjun Ray wrote: >In the case of XSLT, I ignore 7.1.1 and use XSLT's element and attribute >primitives. > Well, I'm using SVG that was exported by a graphics package. From memory, I would guess that the ratio of SVG elements to XSLT elements in this set of documents is somewhere between 50 to 1 and 100 to 1. Creating all those literal result content elements and attributes using the XSLT element and attibute primitives instead is not really plausible here. >Using tag syntax for XSLT itself was one of the most brain-damaged "design >decisions" I've ever seen. > A bold assertion. Perhaps you'd care to support it? My feeling is that I really like the fact that XSLT is XML. I like being able to generate transforms, I like using my XML editor for XSLT, and I like being able to XPath into the current transform itself (using the document() function - handy for little look-ups). Francis.
|
