• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 02:17:42 -0700
• References: <PMUONPJDC51ONRL2UZVTMJWR931TRP.3ce261ed@MChamp>

Mike Champion wrote:

> It's unfortunate that the debate has been cast in terms of
> "characters" vs "types."  It should be about "which types are so
> universal that they can be supported deep in XML without undermining
> the reasons for its success" and "how can type information be passed
> around in a way that is useful for type-aware applications and
> unobtrusive to character-only applications."

Agreed.

-- Ron

• References:
  • Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Previous by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread