• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 00:26:59 -0700
• References: <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALMEBICJAA.evan@e...> <200205130917.KAA23038@p...> <1181819988344.20020513112423@j...>

Jeni Tennison wrote:
> It would make a lot more sense to have this dictated within the
> stylesheet, which then governs the way in which the source document is
> parsed (whether validation is carried out; what happens as a result of
> validation errors) rather than by the source document.

This seems like an awfully XSLT-centric view of the world. I'm sure it's
useful in many cases, but it seems that in the general case the
application, not the stylesheet, should control this.

-- Ron

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: RE: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread