• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: PSVI formalization
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 09 May 2002 21:11:22 -0400
• In-reply-to: <1020992785.2161.2432.camel@l...>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C69B21@r.... com> <1020992785.2161.2432.camel@l...>

On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 21:06, I wrote:
> I'll agree with you that there's
> no implemented PSVI, which makes it very hard to gauge what all this
> PSVI stuff is about.

Oops.  XSV does have a PSVI representation that's quite meaningful if
not fun to work with - I mentioned that earlier today.  I don't think
that's what Dare was looking for, but it's certainly worth noting.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: PSVI formalization
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include?
• Previous by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread