[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 12:14, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> In fact, datatypes are optional in XML schema, static typing will probably 
> be optional in XQuery (there is a note in the XQuery document to that 
> effect), and the operators of XQuery and XPath are all defined for untyped 
> data as well as for typed data. I think that we have put a *lot* of work 
> into making sure that our type system scales to typed data, untyped data, 
> and mixtures of the two.

I don't think that "the features are optional" even begins to qualify as
an answer to the questions we're raising.

> Please, can we see some queries that cause problems, or things that are 
> hard to say or do in XQuery?

No.  I'm not looking for additional features - I'm looking for fewer
features.  This isn't a question of particular queries needing
additional features.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member