• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:59:25 -0400
• Cc: "'Dennis Sosnoski'" <dms@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B4BF@HQ5>; from clbullar@i... on Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:22:03PM -0500
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B4BF@HQ5>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 01:22:03PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> At the rate of attacks, at some point, Outlook 
> will be the most secure and virus resistant client 
> available. 

  ROTFL,

Sorry, security is design based, the process of tranforming a 
product not designed with security in mind by filling up the gaps
one by one as they get discovered on the customer deployments is
simply a pure (and sad) joke.

  Of course producers of closed source software would like people
to believe in this crap, but not here please !!!

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Previous by thread: Re: Painful USA Today article (was RE: ANN: RESTTutorial)
• Next by thread: xsl escaping
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread