• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: a standards story
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 13:50:33 -0400
• In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20020517132321.00b26f00@geekserv1>

5/17/2002 1:24:27 PM, Ann Navarro <ann@w...> wrote:


>Of course HTML 3 to 3.2 was the IETF to W3C transition -- not a W3C vote 
>rejecting a W3C produced draft.

So who rejected "HTML 3.0" as being overly ambitious/complex?  Setting the
stage for HTML 3.2, which was more of an attempt to learn from what 
actually worked in real browsers.

That's my recollection of something I read and lost track of, so apologies
if this is incorrect. 

• References:
  • Re: a standards story
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: a standards story
• Next by Date: Re: Penance for misspent attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: a standards story
• Next by thread: XML Data Integration Platform
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread