• To: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>,"'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5? )
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 07:40:39 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <DC1124C4368AA9438D9DEC34ECB6F162013EBB39@o...>

Simon St. Laurent wrote:

>  Perhaps.  At this point, I'm pretty thoroughly convinced that
>  any effort to apply strong typing to markup is in fact "a whole new
>  class of XML processing apps" - and one that shouldn't be confused
>  with XML.

I think that you are saying that XML, as defined by the current XML 
specifications, should not be confused with XML. I find that confusing.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5? )
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath1.5? )
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5? )
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5?)
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5? )
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5? )
• Next by thread: RE: RE: working with text (was RE: XPath 1.5? )
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread