• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea forXUpdate...
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 08 May 2002 14:15:31 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B412@HQ5>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B412@HQ5>

On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 14:02, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Urr... that list I posted was in my queue specifically 
> because we have to worry about precisely that.  For any 
> vendor that sells in different market tiers, it becomes 
> necessary to use different backend database system with 
> different price break options.   In our case, we have 
> to support three different backend relational systems, 
> and if XML obligates us to datatype definitions, four.

And you've been unable to convince the backend vendors to conform to a
single type system?

Alas.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Multibyte output
• Next by Date: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Previous by thread: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by thread: RE: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread