• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 13:23:51 -0600
• In-reply-to: Message from Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...> of "Mon, 06 May 2002 12:57:24 MDT." <200205061857.g46IvOs16855@l...>
• Sender: uche.ogbuji@f...

BTW, I should clarify that I have no specific complaints against the XQuery formal model spec.  I haven't read it, after all.  My spleen is mostly resolved for XML Schema Data Types.  And even that is insofar as it represents a fundamental addition to the XML "formal model" (i.e. the Infoset) rather than just a bunch of convenient lexical rules for common data constraints.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                                    Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net    http://4Suite.org    http://fourthought.com
Track chair, XML/Web Services One (San Jose, Boston): http://www.xmlconference.com/
DAML Reference - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/05/01/damlref.html
RDF Query using Versa - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think10/index.html
XML, The Model Driven Architecture, and RDF @ XML Europe - http://www.xmleurope.com/2002/kttrack.asp#themodel

• References:
  • Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by Date: typing and markup (was Re: XQuery types)
• Previous by thread: Re: XQuery types was Re: Yet another plea for XUpdate...
• Next by thread: typing and markup (was Re: XQuery types)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread