Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 08:47 PM 5/7/2002 +0100, Ian Fitchet wrote: > > more complex than it is right now, so extending it in this direction > > is not something I would support. > > I don't want you to extend it, I want to. Ah, well I think we can give that to you! > It sounds as though XML Schema may support these things but people > seem to be getting bogged down in the details of particular types > rather than relishing the opportunity to define a context and share > information with greater ease. Both are important. I do think there is a common set of interchange formats that are useful for a large percent of normal business programming, and that XML Schema supports these. It also supports a bunch more.... > > mechanisms like the Schema Adjunct Framework to define mappings among > > date systems. > > ...and field densities and incomes and how spectacular last night's > fireworks were?? Actually, yes. But that's another topic. Jonathan
|
