• To: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
• Subject: RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:07:58 +0300
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcH7NtllL8aimH8jRDi/O+bXcqlBuwAADyNQ
• Thread-topic: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0

> From: Evan Lenz [mailto:evan@e...] 

> In the end, this is why I actually agree with what you said 
> earlier, Ron,
> that dictating a pipeline from within XSLT is too XSLT-centric.

Yup. That's what [1] is supposed to be for. That is supposed to scale
well. Much like Apache's Cocoon stuff, which already works like a charm.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-pipeline/

• Prev by Date: RE: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Next by Date: RE: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 without getting [expletive deleted] into the Processing Model black hole
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament
• Next by thread: OASIS TC Call For Participation: LegalXML Electronic Court Filing TC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread