• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 09:46:10 -0700
• In-reply-to: <3CD8007D.4050401@d...>
• References: <001901c1f5a1$88103d70$6501a8c0@pcukmka><p04330103b8fd71b18eac@[192.168.254.4]><5.1.0.14.0.20020507090946.04de98a8@n...>

At 06:27 PM 5/7/2002 +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>Are we speaking of XPath (as the title says), XQuery or both?
>The issue I see with XPath 2.0 is that it's replacing XPath 1.0 which is 
>now "legacy" and that up to now I don't see the benefit which could 
>compensate the cost of a migration...

I expect that XPath 1.0 will continue to exist for a good long time.

One might ask whether we need XQuery, XPath 1.0, *and* XQuery 2.0. One 
reasonable position would be to drop XQuery 2.0. But the XSLT folks say 
their users really want this additional functionality.

I don't see how adding an XPath 1.5 helps here, I think it just adds to 
fragmentation of XPath.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• References:
  • RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by Date: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread