• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 07 May 2002 11:02:28 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507074150.04decec0@n...>
• References: <001d01c1f543$34db0f30$6501a8c0@pcukmka><001d01c1f543$34db0f30$6501a8c0@pcukmka> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507074150.04decec0@n...>

On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 10:43, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> Can you show me some sample XML data and XPath expressions where you get a 
> result you do not like with XPath 2.0?

If all I cared about was the result and not the process of getting
there, I would not very likely be on xml-dev, would I?

Now, let's get back to talking about creating processes which only
impose costs on the users who want to bear those costs.
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • RE: typing and markup (was Re: XQuery types)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Last Call: Interop Summit Call For Papers
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by thread: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread