• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: Yetanother plea forupdate)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 12:45:26 -0400
• In-reply-to: <059e01c1f2b2$5da7e7f0$7e921690@smuenchlap>

5/3/2002 10:53:59 AM, "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...> wrote:

>As can been seen by the companies participating
>in the SQLX meetings (http://www.sqlx.org/Meetings/MeetingInfo.html),
>we're not alone in this belief of a multiple-syntax
>query world.

The SQLX draft publicly available on www.sqlx.org  is 
almost a year old, and it doesn't
say anything about operators, just mapping XSD data types
onto SQL data types.  Can anyone say something for public
consumption on what SQLX really is, what its status is,
who besides Oracle is really supporting it in products (as opposed to 
sending someone to the meetings)?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: Yet another plea forupdate)
    • From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>

• References:
  • Re: Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: Yet another plea forupdate)
    • From: "Steve Muench" <Steve.Muench@o...>

• Prev by Date: Standards for Transactions
• Next by Date: Re: Re: white space transformations (was xinclude)
• Previous by thread: Re: Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: Yet another plea forupdate)
• Next by thread: Re: Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: Yet another plea forupdate)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread