• To: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: SOAP and the Web
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 19:19:13 -0400
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B3C9@HQ5> <3CD01C16.80606@r...> <3CD06157.11DC0617@p...> <3CD113B5.9060505@r...> <3CD1228E.44FF4CC5@p...> <3CD17D17.8020603@r...> <3CD1814C.51F40CBE@p...> <021f01c1f20d$5c891970$6401a8c0@didierhome> <013b01c1f217$457fd660$6400a8c0@JMG>

Hello Jeff,

Jeff said:
> I *think* that
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xhtml1-20000126
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1
>
> are addresses for the same resource (but there is no way for me to tell --
> it's not permitted for me to know).  I can tell, however, that they
produce
> the same representation when I GET them.  So not everything is 1-1.
>

Didier replies:
Practically speaking you are right and this is one element bringing a lost
of versatility but also potential problems. So let's say that

a resource *should* be *at least* uniquely identified.

cheers
Didier PH Martin

• References:
  • RE: SOAP and the Web
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
  • Re: SOAP and the Web
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Next by Date: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Previous by thread: Re: SOAP and the Web
• Next by thread: Re: SOAP and the Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread