• To: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SOAP and the Web
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 01 May 2002 14:02:59 -0400
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B3CC@HQ5>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B3CC@HQ5>

On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 13:49, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> The market could do as you suggest and flock to SOAP 
> based on ease.  It wouldn't be the first time.  But 
> is it the duty of the TAG to warranty an architecture 
> based on ease, or should they warranty only the architecture 
> designed with 'safety in mind' or whatever criteria are 
> chosen?  

I think we need to know whether this is an engineering discussion or a
business discussion to figure out which criteria are important.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • XML Schema Languages - Presentation by Eric van der List
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• References:
  • RE: SOAP and the Web
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SOAP and the Web
• Next by Date: RE: New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?
• Previous by thread: RE: SOAP and the Web
• Next by thread: XML Schema Languages - Presentation by Eric van der List
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread