• To: Michael Leditschke <mike@a...>
• Subject: RE: Question regarding extension..
• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 09:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <LOBBICBLDJIJHPNJFPOLCEEBCGAA.mike@a...>

No, your previous example is correct. That is exactly what I wanted. I was
just representing the *effective* content model of Book1.

Anyways, thanks.

thanks and regards - murali.

On Sun, 19 May 2002, Michael Leditschke wrote:

> Book1 doesn't look like an extension, but a new
> type containing an element of type Book.
>
> Maybe I've misunderstood?
>
> Regards
> Michael
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...]
> > Sent: Sunday, 19 May 2002 2:11 AM
> > To: xml-dev@l...
> > Subject:  Question regarding extension..
> >
> >
> >
> > Is this extension valid??
> >
> > type Book -> (Title, Author*)
> > type Book1 extends Book -> (Book, Title)
> >
> > thanks and regards - murali.
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
>

• References:
  • RE: Question regarding extension..
    • From: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Processing DTDs
• Next by Date: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Question regarding extension..
• Next by thread: XML Database vs. OO Database
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread