• To: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• Subject: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:28:11 -0400
• Cc: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>, xml-dev<xml-dev@l...>
• References: <3CE193C0.7290457C@r...> <1021424632.5238.22.camel@marajen>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417

> One specification, containing types for the document folks (ID,
> NMTOKEN), for the C-influenced folks (short, unsignedThisAndThat), for
> the database folks (gHorribleKludge).

You're exactly right!  That's the most concise problem definition I've 
seen.  Thanks.

 > Apart from XML, no language on
> earth can natively type this stuff.

One typesys to rule them, and in the darkness bind them.

	/r$

• References:
  • Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by Date: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Previous by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Next by thread: Re: Objections to / uses of PSVI?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread