• To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>,xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 17:12:17 -0700
• In-reply-to: <001301c1fadb$b9030810$0bf13044@tbp>
• References: <NDBBLMPNADEOOKGELJALCEBICJAA.evan@e...>

At 08:10 PM 5/13/2002 -0400, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
>[Evan Lenz]
>
> > Neither. It's a topic that's right on top of the current task force
>agenda.
> > In fact, it's almost funny how timely your note is regarding this. In any
> > case, future drafts will likely deal more explicitly with error handling
> > issues.
> >
>
>Good to know, Evan.  Thanks.

Yep. The language is finally getting to where it is precisely defined 
enough that it makes sense to start nailing down error handling. Until the 
last published specs, we just weren't far enough along to do this. Now we are.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
  • Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: frustration (was RE: XPath 2.0 )
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0
• Previous by thread: Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
• Next by thread: Re: Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread