• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:53:01 -0400
• In-reply-to: <p0433010bb90598b21f6f@[192.168.254.4]>

5/13/2002 12:22:47 PM, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...> wrote:
>
>
>I wouldn't even go so far as to include integers. XPath 1.0/XSLT 1.0 
>works prett well with just floating point numbers.

Fine with me ... I for one could live with a minimal XPath 2 conformance level
that supported the W3C XSD types string, boolean, dateTime, and double.

• References:
  • Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Previous by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Next by thread: Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread