• To: michael.h.kay@n...
• Subject: Re: RE: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 13:58:52 +0100
• Cc: 'Elliotte Rusty Harold' <elharo@m...>, public-qt-comments@w..., xml-dev@l...
• References: <001e01c1f61b$7cb0b570$6501a8c0@pcukmka>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311

Michael Kay wrote:

>I think the closest we could get to that might be to require that an
>implementor documents a method of constructing the input tree from an XML
>document using the "standard mapping" of XML documents to trees.
>
>We would also need to consider whether to put in a similar provision about
>serialization.
>
In other words, a canonical processing sequence?

Francis.

• References:
  • RE: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Next by Date: Re: XPath 1.5? (was RE: typing and markup)
• Previous by thread: RE: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
• Next by thread: RE: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread