• To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>
• Subject: RE: Out of topic or out of interest?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 16:20:35 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Stand up at a bar and complain about the 
topic of conversation.  Then they can talk 
about that for a few weeks.

XML is done.   Questions about XML applications 
are redirected to lists dedicated to the 
applications.  Business cases and how to 
select an architecture are related to the 
philosophy for making a choice.   

Can't leave it to the W3C.  They don't have one.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> I don't know how to formulate this email so that it doesn't sound as 
> critical or inflamatory which is not at all the intent, but the number 
> of emails and threads which I am skipping on xml-dev seems to be growing 
> exponentialy these days.

Me too.  What Eric says. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Next by Date: RE: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Previous by thread: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Next by thread: Re: Out of topic or out of interest?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread