• To: 'Mike Champion' <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:59:19 -0500

POV:  I'd rather lose namespaces than DTDs. 
I seldom aggregate, but I often have to 
validate and get consent.  Namespaces 
don't belong at the lowest level. They 
aren't XML; they are URIs.

OTOH:  Not broken. Don't fix.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...]

It's clear that elements,
attributes, text, and namespaces are more or less universal,
so they belong at the lowest level.  DTDs, data types, 
content model constraints, etc. all have their uses and
belong in the hierarchy, but not in the base.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema
• Next by Date: RE: a standards story
• Previous by thread: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Next by thread: Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread