• To: 'Alaric Snell' <alaric@a...>, "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: PSVI formalization
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 08:41:16 -0500

I asked about that in response to a query from 
my boss about how we would solve the versioning 
for schema designs.  Issues of knowing, for example, 
what version one had without having to open the 
schema and look at an attribute were mentioned, 
(eg, easy to version the file name but that 
raises other hairy problems), so the attribute 
was the easiest.  Of course, that made it a 
non-compliant schema, but when the spec fails, 
to provide needed facilities, one is back to 
using common practice.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@a...]

On Friday 10 May 2002 14:20, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Some have.  Versioning threads started a few years ago.

I fondly remember versioning of namespace URIs, which is heavily related, but 
not versioning within schemas that get given the same namespace URI which is 
what I'm angling at here...

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by Date: Re: PSVI formalization
• Previous by thread: Re: PSVI formalization
• Next by thread: RE: PSVI formalization
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread