• To: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>
• Subject: Re: What does SOAP really add?
• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:15:20 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEFNEHAA.julian.reschke@g...> <3CC577CE.5000702@r...> <20020423113310.J6973@w...> <0b1401c1eadf$8c347820$6400a8c0@JMG>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311

Jeff Greif wrote:

>The HTTP 1.1 spec sanctions the use of POST instead of GET for form
>submission, presumably in cases where GET would otherwise be correct from
>the standpoint of side-effect semantics, in order to keep the parameter
>block from being logged with the URI.  See 15.1.3.
>
Nice - certainly seems to set an appropriate precedent.

Francis.

• References:
  • RE: What does SOAP really add?
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
  • Re: What does SOAP really add?
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: What does SOAP really add?
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
  • Re: What does SOAP really add?
    • From: "Jeff Greif" <jgreif@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: What does SOAP really add?
• Next by Date: RE: W3C Culture and Aims (Was: What does SOAP really ad
• Previous by thread: Re: What does SOAP really add?
• Next by thread: Re: What does SOAP really add?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread