• To: <james.anderson@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:11:16 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <3CB32B8C.4F8D5BD8@s...>
• Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@n...>

> isn't any application better off processing the specialized values in
> the parser's dynamic context than trying to resolve the conflicts
> inherent in dragging that context around indefinitely? from the
> descriptions which i have seen, the status of such values is known at
> the point where they are parsed. are there cases where that
> is not true?


yes, if the value has been blindly copied by an application that didn't know
that the value had a dependency on the context. That's exactly what the
whole XSLT-namespace problem is about.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• References:
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Netscape XSL and ' character
• Next by Date: Entities
• Previous by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread