• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 11:52:57 -0800
• In-reply-to: <3CACEBBE.79A546B0@r...>
• References: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEEAE2@HQ5><1017946755.11733.61.camel@l...>

At 04:11 PM 04/04/02 -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote:
>Namespaces were (and still are) a good idea. Using URLs as example URIs
>in the namespaces spec was a bad idea. It led people to think about
>dereferencing namespace names which, if you think about it, is about as
>odd as dereferencing Java package names. Sure, you can come up with a
>mechanism to do it, but why would you want to?

It would be nice if there a canonical place to find the 
javadoc output.  In fact it would be *very* nice. -Tim

• References:
  • RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs (was Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1)
• Next by thread: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread