• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: [OFFLIST] A new approach to XML Validation
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 12:42:53 -0800

> From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@c...]

<snip/>

> [Sean McGrath]
> 
> 
> > I hope all is will with you. We are busy as usual over here...
> >
> > I'm sending this to you offlist as I want to get my thoughts in
> > shape before I go public with this on xml-dev.
> >
> ...
> I suppose the posting date wouldn't have had anything to do 
> with this... no,
> must have been a coincidence!  Sean would never...

This ties in nicely with that whole thread a short while ago about reliable
predictors for successful XML technologies. I've noticed a definite pattern
in this regard.

If you look over the history of xml-dev, there appears to be a consistent
pattern of ground-breaking, revolutionary technologies being announced on
April 1st, only to be completely forgotten by April 2nd. This seems to be
the one reliable predictor that can be clearly observed on xml-dev.

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL: proposal to document the target namespace of a RDDL document.
• Next by Date: RE: need a [ in an ATTLIST
• Previous by thread: RE: RDDL: proposal to document the target namespace of a RDDL document.
• Next by thread: slides: XML in Browsers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread