• To: clbullar@i... ("Bullard, Claude L (Len)")
• Subject: Re: lots of WS reading material
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:00:23 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: mc@x... ('Mike Champion'), xml-dev@l... (xml-dev)
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E430752B35A@HQ5> from "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" at Apr 25, 2002 04:27:33 PM

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" scripsit:

> Does the Infoset warranty that as well as 
> XML 1.0?  Granted, it can be done with other 
> syntaxes as well, and most of us know, it gets 
> down to choosing one and sticking with it.

Sure it does.  The Infoset is ridiculously close to the XML surface;
it just abstracts away crap like "How many spaces between attributes?"
and "What kind of quotation mark?" and the like.  About the only
thing that disappears without a trace is the physical entity structure.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan@r...>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: lots of WS reading material
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• References:
  • RE: lots of WS reading material
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Can a DTD itself be validated
• Next by Date: Re: idempotent POSTs
• Previous by thread: RE: lots of WS reading material
• Next by thread: Re: lots of WS reading material
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread