• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: xmlns namespace
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 15 Apr 2002 08:16:17 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C6997D@r...>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E05C6997D@r...>

On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 02:52, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> No offence Ron, but I've always felt that the best introduction to XML
> namespaces for newbies is the one on James Clark's site at 
> 
> 	http://www.jclark.com/xml/xmlns.htm 
> 
> It cleared up all the confusion I had about namespaces in a single
> reading.  The document at the end of your link seemed rather daunting in
> comparison. 

That may have something to do with Clark's article being written before
many of the issues surrounding namespaces even emerged.  I find the
piece you cite to be a good summary of the Namespaces in XML 1.0
Recommendation, and similarly lacking in detail.  That lack of detail
may be less confusing to beginners, but I'm not sure it's actually
helpful.

Clark's fondness for disappearing namespace declarations has also been
pretty well ignored. 
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: xmlns namespace
    • From: Sudhakar Kurumella <kurumella@y...>

• References:
  • RE: xmlns namespace
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML to ASCII format
• Next by Date: RE: Will Web Services Kill HTTP?
• Previous by thread: RE: xmlns namespace
• Next by thread: RE: xmlns namespace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread