• To: 'Mike Champion' <mc@x...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:15:09 -0600

It depends on the deal.

Some XML documents don't need namespaces 
even with null values in the systems that 
provide them.   This

<myDoc myValues="myValues" />

does not have a namespace until an XML 
processor adds one.  Namespaces are systemic 
properties, not XML content.

What is the value of adding namespaces to the core 
unless every system layer above it depends on them?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...]

4/4/2002 1:31:45 PM, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...> wrote:

>
>Management training is that until a case 
>with value is made, the answer is always No.
>Why?  It is easier to change no to yes than 
>yes to no.

Ah, but what is value? 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: RE: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by Date: Re: RE: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Next by thread: Re: RE: RE: WD for Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread