• To: amyzing@t..., james.anderson@s...
• Subject: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• From: "Wayne Steele" <xmlmaster@h...>
• Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 21:03:24 -0700
• Bcc:
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

That is an astoundingly good idea.

And very much in concert with the spirit of XML 1.0, and Tim Bray's beloved 
"80/20" point philosophy.

This would make me look forward to XML 1.1, instead of dreading it.

-Wayne Steele


>From: amyzing@t... (Amelia A Lewis)
...
>Here's a proposal for XML 1.1 + Namespaces 1.1: namespace declarations are
>decreed not to apply to attribute or element content (listen for the
>screams).  An application that wants something of that sort gets to invent
>its own attributes or elements to create the definitions, if it wants to
>store QNames in element or attribute content.
...


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
    • From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Common API for XML Pull Parsing (XMLPULL V1)
• Next by Date: RE: Convonluted Standards
• Previous by thread: RE: Transforming a schema with XSL
• Next by thread: Re: [good] Question about NS 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread