[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Every XSLT processor has its own set of extensions, and its own mechanisms to allow users to define extensions. By definition, these are not standardised. However, there has been a tendency for each implementation to copy the extensions provided by others: those available in Xalan are pretty well a subset of those in Saxon, which led the way on many of the popular extensions like multiple output files and xx:evaluate(); and there is also a third-party library of portable extensions provided at http://www.exslt.org.
 

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@n...
work: Michael.Kay@s...

-----Original Message-----
From: Márcio Fernando Keller [mailto:marcio@a...]
Sent: 24 April 2002 18:20
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Are Xalan extensions a standard feature on XSLT processors?

Are Xalan extensions a standard feature on XSLT processors?
 
What other XSLT processor implements?
 
Thanks!

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member